Saturday, 25 July 2015

Obama and the Mullahs



I did write about Obama's Munich in my last post, but I think there is a lot of ink to flow yet over this Obama/Iran deal. I won't call it a "Faustian" deal because neither does  Obama come up to the hero of Goethe's drama nor do  the Ayatollahs reach the hoofed yet rather endearing wickedness of the German Bard's  Mephistopheles.

Since we last met there was a "Stop Iran Rally" in Times Square:







One of the speakers at this rally was former Senator Col. Allen West. I like this fiery American very much and I'd rather see him in the White House than Obama. But I disagree with him  when he comments on the famous quote from  Alexander the Great:

"I would not fear an army of lions if they were led by a sheep,
but I would fear an army of sheep if they were led by a lion"


by suggesting that his great nation of lions is led by a sheep. I have long stopped giving Obama the benefit of the doubt and fear that America and the rest of West is led by the nose,  not by a sheep, but by a snake.  









Caroline Glick, whom I can well imagine as a future Golda Meir, also spoke at that Rally and she freshened up an often used Goethe quote "Der Teufel ist im Detail" by turning it around like so: 

"The devil in this agreement is not in the detail, 
the devil in this agreement is in the big picture!"


One of my favourite writers, the brilliant Daniel Greenfield (aka Sultan Knisch) writes in his article: The Myth of Iran's Peaceful Nuclear Program:

"...The Supreme Leader of Iran already made it clear that the war will continue until America is destroyed. That may be the only common ground he has with Obama. Both America and Iran are governed by fanatics who believe that America is the source of all evil. Both believe that it needs to be destroyed. 



Carter made the Islamic Revolution possible. Obama is enabling its nuclear revolution.  



Today Tehran and Washington D.C. are united by a deep distrust of America, distaste for the West and a violent hatred of Israel. This deal ...[...]... is not meant to stop Iran from getting a nuclear bomb. It is meant to stop America and Israel from stopping it...."









Obama and the Mullahs sitting in the tree
K-i-s-s-i-n-g! 
First comes love.
Then comes marriage.
Then comes baby* in the baby carriage,
Sucking his thumb,
Wetting his pants,
Doing the hula, hula dance!








Lets quickly introduce a little note of optimism: "This will not be the end of the world" sung by Zarah Leander:






Some more of Obama's friends, speaking last week 














And here is the "last word" coming from the "Supreme Leader's" twitter-feed.



h/t Andrew Bolt Blog







Wednesday, 15 July 2015

Obama's Munich: Chamberlain or Mufti Al-Husseini?



!!! Gotcha !!!
Oinc-Allahuakbar-Oinc













When people compare Obama's nuclear  "deal" with Iran's Ayatollahs to a modern day "Munich" (and the more intelligent commentators do), they refer to this: 










I do believe that Chamberlain was naive. 











Do I believe that Obama is naive

No! 





While Hitler's Germany, at the time of Chamberlain, was still somewhat "in the closet", and Chamberlain could have but did not know it, Iran has for decades called openly for the annihilation of  America, Israel and the Jews (as recently as just a few days ago)  But even if I was to give Obama the benefit of the doubt and use the same excuse as  his  defenders  i.e. "He did not know", I tend to agree with the man who said: 


“When the consequences of naivety are the same as the consequences of malice, it is wiser and safer to assume malice.” (or words to that effect)






And here is a little glimpse of the parallels I draw with that other visit to Munich, the one which the Grand Mufti of Israel   made  to Adolf né Schickelgruber:











Obama's possible Motivation(s)?

I strongly believe that Obama does not like  Jews other than the self-loathing ones who would vote for him even  a 3rd time - and he only likes those as a means to an end. His contempt and hatred for- or envy of the Jews, which was so much in evidence by the treatment of Netanyahu and Israel during his presidency, was probably acquired during the first 7 years of his life (*), when he was being brought up  as a Muslim in Indonesia. (Both his fathers were Muslims I think). 

Whether it is this dislike of Jews which  he has in common with the Ayatollahs, or a sense of obligation to pay back  the Nobel-Prize mob for their premature ejaculation of his Peace Prize, or whether it is  a combination of the  many mysterious  strings that pull him, one thing seems clear to me: he wanted Iran to get "the bomb" and he just about achieved it. In my not-so-humble opinion, Barack Hussein Obama was not so much "negotiating" on behalf of America and the West as he was campaigning on behalf of Iran.  




       






An uncomfortable afterthought: 

If it is true, and I believe it is, that it was the Obama Administration who installed the Muslim Brotherhood's   Mohamed Morsi as Egypt's ruler (yes yes I knouuuwww, he was "voted" in) the new leader of Egypt,  Abdel_Fattah_el-SISI put an end to whatever Obama's plans were. So,  somewhat  dangerously for my credibility, I will speculate: perhaps, as Obama's "ambitions" (whatever they were) were  thwarted in Egypt, he tried to satisfy them with Iran, and his second attempt was dangerously more successful............at our peril. 


A little trivial observation: Isn't it cute how "Sisi" is spelled "Isis" backwards. Give me Sisi any time over Isis :)








(*) "give me a child to the age of 7 and I give you the man" attributed to the  Jesuits.





















.

Tuesday, 7 July 2015

Progressives and other Wankers










Definition of "Islamophobia" by the late Christopher Hitchens: 

"a word created by Fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons"







    






Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Bibi's love letter to the new Gaza Flotilla






Last time, the boatloads of useful idiots and their "Lets-bring-some-Love-to-Hamas-Flotilla" were sponsored by Erdogan, the Turkish Adolf with Caliph ambitions; consequently, there were quite a few terrorists among them who subsequently met their 72 virgins earlier than they had planned to.  And they nearly conned the world, remember?





Last week they were at it again.



The Israeli Navy intercepted a Gaza-bound flotilla overnight Sunday-Monday meant to break the maritime blockade on the Strip.



Israeli commandos boarded the main ship, the Swedish registered Marianne of Gothenburg, and took control of the vessel. The IDF said the interception occurred without an incident or injuries.






What's with all the perimenopausal females joining these exhibitionist lying-feasts?(their demographic is also overrepresented in the nastily racist BDS movement). Do they just hate Jews so much, are they really that dumb, or is their motivation some masturbatory dream of getting laid by a HAMAS terrorist? 



Anyway, this beauty above may have been on one of the 3 "Freedom Flotilla III" vessels that turned back unexpectedly with activists on board issuing this statement: "We once again call on the government of Israel to finally lift the blockade on Gaza. Our destination remains the conscience of humanity". (my bolds). No shrinking violets these faux compassionistas, are they.










One of the four boats that formed the “Freedom Flotilla III”, the "Marianne" was intercepted by the IDF Navy in their attempt to breach the maritime blockade. It has been towed to the Ashdod port by a naval patrol, after which activists on board the ship will most likely be deported.



(Photo: YouTube Screen shot)




“In accordance with international law, the Israeli Navy advised the vessel several times to change course,” the IDF confirmed in a statement. “Following their refusal, forces visited and searched the vessel in international waters in order to prevent the intended breach of the maritime blockade on the Gaza Strip.”

“The forces have reported that use of force was unnecessary, and that the process was uneventful. "





Here is a nice group photo of the cruise passengers for the souvenir album: 


On board the Marianne were 18 activists, 
including former Tunisian president Moncef Marzouki and Arab MK Basel Ghattas



Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed naval commandos for “their determined and efficient action in detaining the passengers on the ship that tried to reach the Gaza coast in contravention of the law.”



In a statement released to the media, the prime minister added: 

“This flotilla is nothing but a demonstration of hypocrisy and lies that is only assisting the Hamas terrorist organisation and ignores all of the horrors in our region. Preventing entry by sea was done in accordance with international law and even received backing from a committee of the UN Secretary General.”



But I saved the best for last:


On Sunday, Netanyahu’s office released a special letter for the flotilla activists:






“Welcome to Israel!” 


“It appears you’ve made a mistake along the way. Perhaps you meant to sail somewhere not far from here — Syria. There, Assad’s regime is massacring his own people every day with the help of the murderous Iranian regime.

In contrast, here in Israel, we are dealing with a situation where terrorist organisations such as Hamas are trying to harm innocent civilians. In the face of these attempts, we are protecting the citizens of Israel in accordance with international law.

If human rights really interested you, you wouldn’t sail in solidarity with a terror group that executes Gazans without trial, and uses Gazan children as human shields.”


I don't know if Bibi finished this letter of with kisses or if he expressed the wish to see the visitors all soon again...





Update 1. 7. 2015:


The Daily Algemeiner shows exclusive images of the ship's interception and describes a dialogue taking place between the IDF and the Ship's captain:


"...Soldiers can also be heard addressing former Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki who was on board the flotilla. One of the Israelis told Marzouki: “I am surprised that you are on your way to support a regime which has the same ideology of those who committed an act of terror on your shores.” The soldier was referring to the brutal assault on Friday by Islamic State sympathizer Seifeddine Rezgui, who killed dozens of innocents at a Tunisian resort, mainly British and European vacationers."






Update 2. 


A spokesperson from the Israeli embassy in Wellington said: “Recent pronouncements and interviews concerning the Marianne ship have deliberately obscured some basic facts:


1. Gaza is open to all humanitarian aid through the crossings from Israel.


2. Every day about 550 truckloads of goods carrying everything from foodstuffs to vehicles pass into Gaza from Israel. 

3. 10 million USD are invested to upgrade the border crossings to permit passing of up to 1000 trucks per day.

4. The only restrictions apply to weapons and a list of dual-use items which can be used to manufacture weapons and terrorist infrastructure


5. Barring the entrance of boats and ships in the Gaza Strip is in accordance with international law.”




P.S.: 

The UN, a tool of HAMAS terrorists



Colonel Rechard Kemp tells the UN to its face that it is a tool of Hamas terrorists






Address of Colonel Richard Kemp to the United Nations Human Rights Council
Geneva, 29 June 2015.



"Mr. President, I fought in combat zones around the world during 30 years’ service in the British Army. I was present as an observer throughout the conflict in Gaza.

Mr. President, during the 2014 Gaza conflict, Hamas, to its eternal shame, did more to deliberately and systematically inflict death, suffering and destruction on its own civilian population, including its children, than any other terrorist group in history.

Hamas deliberately positioned its fighters and weapons in civilian areas, knowing that Israel would have no choice but to attack these targets, which were a clear and present threat to the lives of Israel’s own civilian population.

While the IDF made efforts, unprecedented in any other army, and exceeding the requirements of the laws of war, to save Palestinian civilian lives, including warning them to leave target zones, Hamas forced them to remain in those areas.

Unable to defeat Israel by military means, Hamas sought to cause large numbers of casualties among their own people in order to bring international condemnation against Israel, especially from the United Nations.

This was the cornerstone of Hamas’s strategy. It was Hamas’s strategy, not illegal Israeli action, as this report shamefully alleges, without a shred of evidence, that was the reason why over 1,000 civilians died in Gaza.

By denying this truth, and by refusing to admit the manifest reality that the conflict in Gaza was caused by Hamas’s war of aggression against Israel, this report faithfully reiterates Hamas’s own false narrative.

This council has for too long allowed itself to become a tool of Hamas’s murderous strategy. By unjustly condemning Israel, by refusing to condemn Hamas’s repeated and unprovoked aggression, this council has consistently validated and encouraged Hamas’s tactics.

I urge all delegates to this council to reject this report. Failure to do so amounts to support of Hamas terrorism and will result in further rounds of violence in Gaza and Israel. The price for that will be paid in the blood of the people of Gaza and Israel."                      
Source: UNWatch






P.S.:












Friday, 26 June 2015

"Nothing to do with Islam"



Here Pat Condell quotes: Obama, Cameron, Merkel, Hollande, and many more Western "Leaders" who are followers very much in the same way politicians of the  Schickelgruber Era were. He also quotes a large majority in Academia, the Greens, the formerly 4th Estate now often the 5th Column that the media has become, in fact the whole Left and, last but not least the silent majority of muslims. 






Seeing that the decapitated victim in France was the Boss of the muslim head chopper, here is another video  by the brilliant Pat Condell in which he gives advice that seems even more relevant now.





A question: (and it's not all that rhetorical) 

Why do they call the "month of Ramadan"  the "HOLY" month? 

A comment:  

Now you can see perhaps why I (and anyone not completely blind or of extreme bad will) say that "Israel is fighting our War"


):No Music for this post :(


May the victims of this latest muslim kill fest, which had everything to do with Islam, rest in peace. 

May the politicians, media, faux compassionistas and assorted enablers of these atrocities not rest in peace. 




Update 29. 6. 2015

And so the "whitewash" of the jihadist decapitation of a French man on French soil  starts, as in : "Nothing to do with Islam": 


Below are 3 twitter posts  by ITele (a French TV station) that tell a short synopsis of the article translated  below. The first tweet, which is not in the article, tells of  the additional “comment” by the jihadi head chopper of France in which  he stated to police that he “did it” because of tensions between him and his employer, but he added as an other cause (significant in my opinion) also "tension between him and his wife". 







Here then is the article which tells of how the whitewashing has already started and the conclusion will no doubt be: 


"IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM" 


"The main suspect of the attack in Isère, Yassin Salhi, reportedly admitted to investigators that he killed his boss. But according to some in the French media, his gesture had been the consequence of a simple personal dispute with him. 


Yassin Salhi has begun to lift the veil on his act. The alleged perpetrator of the "terrorist attack" - which could now be described simply as an "attack" - committed Friday at Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, in Isère, admitted killing his boss, according to several sources close to the investigation.


But this murder might not be related to "Islamist terrorism" as immediately pointed to  by the Prime Minister Manuel Valls.


According to information from the French news channel iTV, in custody, he  [the killer muslim] evoked a dispute with his employer, and the intention to commit suicide and cause a media coup. A version that takes up a hypothesis already formulated by Wassim Nasr and David Thomson, specialists jihadist networks in France 24 and RFI, that the gesture of Yassin Salhi could be the consequence of a simple personal dispute with his boss.


Shortly after the attack, the French president had reacted from  Brussels, stating that it was an attack "of a terrorist nature."


According to police from the Anti-Terrorism Sub-Directorate (SDAT):


"We note that the Islamic state never claimed his action. Typically, the organisation calls for the execution of policemen, soldiers, Jews, but not  SME  managers.


Finally, the two flags found on each side of the [severed] head of Hervé C. on the grid do indeed mention the shahada [the Muslim profession of faith] but they have nothing to do with the Islamic state. "


"His testimony confirms that the primary intention of Salhi seems to have been the killing of his boss but, since he has been highly radicalised for at least ten years, he did it in the jihadist imagery," says Libération, a police source"

.




Shame France, Shame !


This one pulls at my heart strings. 

It came with a press release from "Les Identitaires", a group of young French patriots who are trying, by peaceful means, to save their country. So, of course, the nasty forces in Hollande's extreme left,  socialist Government and the conformist French media have labelled them long since as the  "extreeeeeeme  rrrrright".  I respect their courage to help "hope" along a little.



Here is the translation of their press release from the 24 June 2015 


Solidarity with Angelo, a French dad thrown into the street with his wife and baby 
"A video released by the 'Taxpayers Association' and already viewed more than 500,000 times, has, justifiably aroused the indignation of many French.

In this video, Angelo, a young French dad, thrown out on the street with his young family following the loss of his employment, tells how he is forced to beg in order to provide a home for their baby.

None of the State Assistance- or Community- structures he approached could give him any help. "They told me that, if I had been an asylum seeker or in an irregular situation, there would be the solution of hotel accommodation for us, but only immigrants are accommodated in that hotel. The young father shares his distress and legitimate anger.
The tragic story of Angelo is unfortunately not an isolated case:

The militants "Identitaires" participate every winter in the operation "Generation Solidarity" among homeless and are regularly confronted with similar situations. The majority of people living in the street are of French origin, while illegal immigrants are taken in charge by the State, through the State Medical Aid (which covers all their medical expenses from the smallest to the most expensive) and through emergency accommodation. On June 12, a statement from the city of Nanterre informed us that 30 (French) homeless had to leave a reception centre so that illegal immigrants could be housed there!

Unlike some of these illegals, Angelo asks for nothing. He did not ask for money but above all employment, preferably in hospitality, in his region of La Rochelle. If you can help, please contact us on contact@generation-identitaire.com. We also pass on to him your messages of support."





   






Incidentally, the very "Socialist" President Hollande calls the poor of France "les sans-dents" (the toothless) according to the "stop-kissing-and-tell-all" revenge book by his last Mistress, Valérie Trierweiler