"...In Norway, the fox is not only guarding the hen house, he is instructing the hens how to become more tender and delicious for the sake of the Modern Multicultural Norwegian Utopia..."
... writes Baron Bodissey from Gates of Vienna in an article entitled "Multicultural Indoctrination for the Norwegian Police".
And yes, lets talk about that Anders Breivik:
Richard Millet, novelist, essayist, editor (now ex-editor) of Gallimard, considered one of the greatest contemporary French writers, was hunted down and out of (Paris) town after writing an essay about this Norwegian mass killer. He called it, bitingly and with an irony escaping only those who wilfully wanted to run away from it anyway: “Eloge litteraire d’Anders Breivik”(*). Immeeeediate collective huffing and puffing followed by an evanouissement en masse of the media herd and banishment to St. Helena, (or the literati equivalent) of Millet. He lost his job and, so “they” (**) hope, all his crédibilité. I have just finished reading his essay and here I quote a few excerpts, without fear or favour, ..well in truth with a little of the latter ;) :
Predictably, the baying media pack completely ignored his mantra, repeated several times in the essay: “Je n’approuve pas les actes commis par Breivik, le 22 juillet 2011, en Norvege” (I do not approve of the acts committed by Brevik on 22. 7. 2011 in Norway).
“Je ne suis pas un “expert” et nullement proche de Breivik dont, je le repete, je condamne les actes; je constate que la derive de Breivik s’inscrit dans la grande perte d’innocence et d’espoir caractérisant l’Occident…..[snip]…. Breivik est, comme tant d’autres individus, jeunes ou non, exemplaire d’une population devant qui la constante devalorisation de l’idee de nation, l’opprobre jetee sur l’amour de son pays, voire la criminalisation du patriotisme, ouvrent un abime identitaire…. (pp.109)
“I am not an “expert” and in no way am I close to Breivik whose acts (I repeat) I condemn; I note that the downward spiral of Breivik falls within the huge loss of innocence and hope that characterises the West…..(snip)…....Breivik is, as so many other individuals (young or not) typical of a population before whom the relentless devalorisation of their Idea of “Nation” and the scorn thrown on the love for their country, ie the criminalisation of patriotism, opens the abyss of identity loss...
….Breivik est, certes, le signe desespéré, et desesperant, de la sous-estimation par l’Europe des ravages du multiculturalisme:……(pp 114)
Breivik surely is the hopeless and desperate sign of Europe’s underestimation of the ravages that multiculturalism has wreaked…
...Vision lenifiante d’un “exotism” à domicile…….Dans cette décadence, Breivik est sans doute ce que meritait la Norvege et ce qui attend nos sociétés qui ne cessent de s’aveugler pour mieux se rénier…. (pp119)
...Lenin-ified vision of a domestic "exoticism"... Within this decadence, Breivik is, without doubt, what Norway had coming to it, and what awaits our societies who incessantly and willfully blind themselves in order to better deny what they are... (or should/could be).
*) Richard Millet
LANGUE FANTOME suivi de ELOGE LITTERAIRE D'ANDERS VREIVIK
Ed. Pierre-Guillaume de Roux, 2012
**) Those whom I hold responsible for the creation of Breivik-style mass killers.
From the Front Magazine’s article: Importing Islamic Nightmares
"...Yes, there is a serious proposal afoot in Norway to ban “anti-Feminist hatred”. Yes, the ministry really has the Orwellian name of Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion. And yes, this State Secretary in Norway really is called Ahmad Ghanizadeh, originally from Iran…..
...Norway is a small country, but I still find it unhealthy that a sitting political head of state uses his most prestigious annual speech addressing the nation to launch a thinly veiled attack on individual citizens who have done nothing criminal..."
Norwegian Foreign Ministry finances terrorists (from PMW)